Fall 2018 Season Stats Print stats
9/22/2018 2:45 am
Week: 1
Week 3 Scores
Home TeamWinsVisiting TeamWins
What had Happened WasT-N-T
Angle 1Hot Chocolate & the Marshmallows
Dartaholics AnonymousOrifice of Evil
Loose CannonsBYE

Team Standings as of Week 3
Division 1
TeamTotal WinsTotal LossesWin %Byes leftMake ups
What had Happened Was000%20
Loose Cannons000%10
Dartaholics Anonymous000%20
Division 2
TeamTotal WinsTotal LossesWin %Byes leftMake ups
Orifice of Evil181260%10
T-N-T121840%20
Hot Chocolate & the Marshmallows000%10
Angle 1000%20

Player Standings as of Week 3
Division 1
PlacePlayer Name123Total
TGPTotal Games Played (Singles and Doubles)
PPGAPersonal Points Per Game Average
Win %Singles Games Win %
Rating
171-180High In
High OutHigh Mark Out
6 Cork9 Mark

Division 2
PlacePlayer Name123Total
TGPTotal Games Played (Singles and Doubles)
PPGAPersonal Points Per Game Average
Win %Singles Games Win %
Rating
1
Jeff B
22
--
--
22
10
2.2
60
1068
2
John Moore
19
--
--
19
10
1.9
60
1049
3
Doug P
17
--
--
17
10
1.7
80
1082
4
Chris K
13
--
--
13
10
1.3
66.7
1061
171-180High In
High OutHigh Mark Out
6 Cork9 Mark

Division 3
PlacePlayer Name123Total
TGPTotal Games Played (Singles and Doubles)
PPGAPersonal Points Per Game Average
Win %Singles Games Win %
Rating
1
Charlie S
19
--
--
19
10
1.9
66.7
1052
2
Jimmy C
12
--
--
12
9
1.33
20
979
3
Oscar Ross
10
--
--
10
10
1
20
972
4
Rick Johnson
3
--
--
3
9
0.33
20
971
171-180High In
High OutHigh Mark Out
6 Cork9 Mark

Show Player Rating Details

Initial player ratings:

Player: John Downes Rating:
Player: Chris K Rating: 1026
Player: Howard B Rating:
Player: Nick C Rating:
Player: Mike Darby Rating:
Player: Mike Jones Rating:
Player: Thornie P Rating:
Player: Mike Lantz Rating:
Player: Donna L Rating:
Player: Tina G Rating:
Player: Mel F Rating:
Player: Dana W Rating:
Player: Dan N Rating:
Player: Kim G Rating:
Player: Mike Webster Rating:
Player: John Moore Rating: 1038
Player: Fred J Rating:
Player: Jimmy C Rating: 1027
Player: Heather Rating:
Player: Dave Bonham Rating:
Player: Charlie S Rating: 1038
Player: Tie Die Rating:
Player: Kelli Rating:
Player: Bill K Rating:
Player: Jeff B Rating: 1044
Player: Howard Laisure Rating:
Player: Mike Lagana Rating:
Player: Chuck D Rating:
Player: Greg O Rating:
Player: Jimmy O Rating:
Player: Missy M Rating: 0
Player: Daryl J Rating:
Player: Lee F Rating:
Player: Travis Rating:
Player: Tim Stohl Rating:
Player: John Jay Jr. Rating:
Player: Erica Drake Rating:
Player: George R Rating:
Player: Nick Hicks Rating:
Player: Dre Rating:
Player: Juliana O Rating:
Player: Steve H Rating:
Player: Nick J Rating:
Player: Tom Conrad Jr. Rating:
Player: Tom Anders Rating:
Player: Oscar Ross Rating: 1020
Player: Paul Rating:
Player: John K Rating:
Player: Mike F Rating:
Player: Joe L Rating:
Player: Doug P Rating: 1034
Player: Debi Lambros Rating:
Player: Tom Conrad Sr. Rating:
Player: Lee B Rating:
Player: Kristen B Rating:
Player: Rick Johnson Rating: 1007
Player: TJ Rating:
Player: Tammy V Rating: 0
Player: Jessica Rating:
Player: Larry Cox Rating:
Player: Kevin Rating:

Week 1:

For winning a game Jeff B gained 17 points from Chris K. New ratings: Jeff B: 1061, Chris K: 1009
For winning a game Chris K gained 16 points from Jeff B. New ratings: Jeff B: 1045, Chris K: 1025
For winning a game Chris K gained 15 points from Jeff B. New ratings: Jeff B: 1030, Chris K: 1040
For winning a game Doug P gained 18 points from Jimmy C. New ratings: Jimmy C: 1009, Doug P: 1052
For winning a game Doug P gained 16 points from Jimmy C. New ratings: Jimmy C: 993, Doug P: 1068
For winning a game John Moore gained 17 points from Rick Johnson. New ratings: John Moore: 1055, Rick Johnson: 990
For winning a game John Moore gained 15 points from Rick Johnson. New ratings: John Moore: 1070, Rick Johnson: 975
For winning a game Charlie S gained 15 points from Oscar Ross. New ratings: Charlie S: 1053, Oscar Ross: 1005
For winning a game Charlie S gained 14 points from Oscar Ross. New ratings: Charlie S: 1067, Oscar Ross: 991
For winning a game Oscar Ross gained 19 points from Charlie S. New ratings: Charlie S: 1048, Oscar Ross: 1010
For winning a game Jeff B gained 20 points from Oscar Ross. New ratings: Jeff B: 1050, Oscar Ross: 990
For winning a game Jeff B gained 18 points from Oscar Ross. New ratings: Jeff B: 1068, Oscar Ross: 972
For winning a game Charlie S gained 13 points from Rick Johnson. New ratings: Charlie S: 1061, Rick Johnson: 962
For winning a game Charlie S gained 12 points from Rick Johnson. New ratings: Charlie S: 1073, Rick Johnson: 950
For winning a game Rick Johnson gained 21 points from Charlie S. New ratings: Charlie S: 1052, Rick Johnson: 971
For winning a game Jimmy C gained 17 points from Doug P. New ratings: Jimmy C: 1010, Doug P: 1051
For winning a game Doug P gained 16 points from Jimmy C. New ratings: Jimmy C: 994, Doug P: 1067
For winning a game Doug P gained 15 points from Jimmy C. New ratings: Jimmy C: 979, Doug P: 1082
For winning a game John Moore gained 15 points from Chris K. New ratings: John Moore: 1085, Chris K: 1025
For winning a game Chris K gained 19 points from John Moore. New ratings: John Moore: 1066, Chris K: 1044
For winning a game Chris K gained 17 points from John Moore. New ratings: John Moore: 1049, Chris K: 1061

Week 2:

Week 3:

Show how the rating calculated
How is the rating calculated:
  1. Base rating is set at 1000 (this is just so we don't have negative ratings)
  2. Personal Points per Game Average times 20 is added to the Base rating (this is done to get an initial spread in the ratings, 20 is considered the weight the Personal Points per Game Average is given in the ratings)
  3. For each singles game a player plays we calculate the points exchanged from the loser of the game to the winner of the game.
  4. We adjust the lower ranked players rating up 50 points per difference in rank (a rank 3 shooter will get 100 points on their rating when facing a rank 1 shooter, this is an attempt to take the handicap into account)
  5. Given the adjusted ratings we calculated expected win % as 1 / (1 + 10^(($playerBRating - $playerARating)/ 400)) In this equation 400 is double the points difference needed to give one player a 75% chance of beating the other.
  6. Finally we can calculate the points exchanged between players as K * (1-expectedWin%) Where K is the weight each game is given in the ratings. If there is a 50/50 chance either player could win there would be 16 points exchanged between the players.

The variables in these ratings come down to how much weight we put on the PPGA (20), the weight we give the handicap (50) and the weight we give each game (32). I am still seeing if these numbers make sense and might adjust them as we get more data.